March2006




Newsletter Navigation:
Student Regent for UT System... Periodical Survey Results ... Winter Bowl ... Student Government Office ... Spring Fling ... Medical School Dean Recovering from Cardiac Surgery...Student Researchers at the Dental Branch ... Faith and Science- A Marriage of Passions

 

 


Student Regent for The University of Texas System
By Stephen Kry

UT System SealOn February 3rd Governor Perry announced the appointment of a student member to the Board of Regents for The University of Texas System. He chose Brian Haley from the University of Texas at Austin. Importantly, this student regent does not have voting privileges. Otherwise, he has all the same powers and duties as the other regents. This appointment makes the UT System one of a small number of universities nation-wide that has a student on its Board. This appointment should allow for more direct student involvement and perspective in issues facing the Board.

The UT System Board of Regents is a delegation appointed by the governor to oversee the operations of the 15 academic and health science campuses that comprise the UT System. The Board has the duty and responsibility to provide for the maintenance, support, and direction of these institutions at the highest level. The Board addresses many different operational aspects impacting students including tuition and fees, student conduct and discipline, disability accommodation, and student governance. Considering these issues, it is a wonderful development that we now have a direct voice on the Board.

Governor Perry selected Brian Haley from a pool of candidates from each of the 15 component institutions of the UT System. Each component institution submitted five candidates for consideration. The outstanding candidates from the UT Health Science Center at Houston were: Ms. Candice Anne Marcum (Medical School), Ms. Eileen Merkle (Medical School), Ms. Theodora Dorina Papageorgiou (School of Public Health), Mr. Chirag B. Patel (Medical School), and Ms. Bahareh Tavana (Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences). Congratulations to these five candidates, and hopefully next year Governor Perry will select an individual from our institution


Periodical Survey Results
by John C. McAuliffe

As many know, the SIC public affairs committee ran a survey for a potential student periodical. While there are many student readers of current institutional publications, the SIC questioned whether UTHSC should have a student-specific paper. Equal to the task, the SIC public affairs committee designed the online survey to answer the SIC’s concerns. The survey was open for 2 weeks and collected 911 responses. This is 26% of the UTHSC student body enrollment. The survey had 3 objectives. First, the survey sought to determine the number of readers of current institutional periodicals. Second, the survey questioned whether a student-specific periodical was desired. Lastly, it tried to determine what topics should be covered to make it useful to the students. The survey collected loads of good data that interests not only the designers of a potential student paper but also members of the editorial board of the current institutional publications. The long and short of the results can be summed up as follows:

Students want a student paper!

Poll graphicAs the figure shows, 75% of responders felt a student-specific paper would benefit the UTHSC campus. Student comments collected from the survey stated that a student paper would give this campus a sense of community that is lacking. “It does not seem as though a strong UT community exists, rather strong individual schools,” writes one student. While this student may be correct, the SIC makes strides to foster campus life and inter-school interaction. A student paper would be a strong effort to confront this student’s concern. Another student responder candidly comments, “institutional newsletters announce events or report on what the big-wigs are doing…articles are used as a way for the institution to give itself a pat on the back. I want to veg a little, relax, get information, and be entertained.” This comment certainly made the Internal Communications Advisory Committee chuckle. This committee and the SIC realize there is a gap to be filled and a student-specific paper may just be the filler. There is much excitement in the SIC about this project. However, there is great concern. This project will be difficult, requiring lots of work.

The SIC asks for patience while they work hard for you on this matter. Also, the SIC asks that any and all students interested in writing for the paper to please contact an SIC member for more information. The public affairs committee would like to extent special thanks to Adol Esquivel, M.D., MS, from the SHIS for his computer wizardry.


Winter Bowl A Big Hit
by John C. McAuliffe

Your SIC hosted its latest swingin’ good time February 11th at Palace Lanes, 4191 Bellaire Blvd. Two hundred students, friends, and family attended. Each of the six institution’s schools was well represented. Balls rolled and pins flew as those enjoyed bowling, sodas, and pizza for the afternoon.

Students at the Winter Bowl “This was so much fun. Thanks for setting this up,” a happy SPH student exclaimed while leaving. This certainly seemed the general opinion of those attending in spite of a shortage of pizza. The organizers were unable to anticipate the popularity of this event. So, some students began praying for more pizza.

The SIC delivered and so did Papa John’s but to no avail. Appetites could not be appeased and some went hungry. I guess the early bird gets the pepperoni. None the less, the party was a great success. Students competed, talked a little trash, and relaxed.

A nursing student was overheard stating, “We should have more get togethers like this.” Well in fact; if you missed out on this event, look for the SIC St. Patrick’s Day Party and the SIC Spring Fling. These up-coming parties will once again prove that students of the UTHSC know how to have a great time.


Student Government Office
By John C. McAuliffe

The administration has been gracious and given student governance an office of its own in the School of Nursing and Student Community Building. The office is located on the ground floor. The SIC and each school’s student government organization (SGO) have discussed plans and visions for this office. The SIC’s vision for this room is to be a central hub of student communication. Fliers and handouts applicable to many facets of institutional student life will be found here. As the SIC and SGOs move in, they ask that students come by and get familiar with the new office. Student governance hopes that this new, central location will be more convenient and foster more student life here at the UTHSC.


All work and no play makes for a very tired bunch of future health professionals.
By Lauren Casile

leprechaun clip artThe Student InterCouncil (SIC) will host two more student social events this semester: St. Patty’s Day and Spring Fling. St. Patrick’s Day, on March 17th (Friday, 4pm-7pm), promises to be an exciting time of commemoration of the famous Irish holiday. What better way to end the work week than stopping by the School of Nursing breezeway with a FREE, cold, Irish frothy beverage in hand? In full Irish fashion, you may hear the echoed chants of “Erin Go Bragh.” Food, games, and music will set the backdrop for this festive event when everyone is Irish for a day.

Last year’s Spring Fling with a poker night theme was a banging success! Because you asked for more, Spring Fling will be bigger and better this year. Planning is under works for this last bash of the semester. As we bid adieu to the graduating class of 2006, we welcome all students to partake of this enjoyable and much deserved celebration. We take our hats off and hands down to this year’s hard work!

Clover


Medical School Dean Recovering from Cardiac Surgery
By Julia Shields

Dr Stanley ShultzDr. Stanley Shultz, dean of the medical school, received successful emergency heart bypass surgery at Memorial Hermann Hospital on November 29, 2005. Dean Shultz continues recovering in a private room at Hermann: able to sit up, talk, and still manage to keep informed about the school community. Dr. Schultz and his family ask that we respect their privacy as he recovers. However, several “Get Well” banners decorated with signatures and heartfelt messages of the medical school community have been sent to brighten the walls of his room. Currently, well-wishers may contribute to more posters which are located in the Leather Lounge of the Medical School Lobby. Notes and cards may be sent through the Dean’s Office as well.

Dr. Shultz completed his undergraduate degree at Columbia University and was awarded his M.D. from New York University, beginning a prolific career in medicine. After completing his residency in internal medicine and a fellowship in cardiology, he turned his attention to research and pedagogy. A faculty member at UT Houston Medical School since 1979, he held the chair of the Department of Physiology and Cell Biology from 1979 until 1995.

Dr. Shultz has been honored with such prestigious awards as the Fondren Family Chair in Cellular Signaling, the UTHSC-Houston President’s Scholar Award (1999), and the American Physiological Society’s Daggs Award (2000). He even managed to find the time to serve as the president of the American Physiological Society between 1992 and 1993. Additionally he has provided editorial services to a plethora of physiology journals and contributed to over 200 publications and textbooks.

The next time you enjoy a refreshing Gatorade®, remember that you have Dr. Stanley Shultz to thank for that tasty goodness. His early work established the hypothesis of sodium-coupled sugar and amino acid absorption. This provided the basis for oral rehydration therapy (ORT). ORT has become a worldwide standard of treatment of diarrheal diseases, In Dean Shultz’s absence, Dr. Michael McKinney, senior executive vice president and chief operating officer, has assumed responsibility for the duties of the medical school dean. Concern, cares, and hopes for Dr. Shultz to continue to heal are shared by all of the UT Health Science Center-Houston community.

Cards for Dean Shultz may be sent through:

Office of the Dean
UT Medical School
6431 Fannin, JJL 410
Houston, TX 77030


Student Researchers at the Dental Branch
by Brett Chiquet

Student Researchers at the Dental BranchFirst and second year student researchers from the UT Dental Branch presented their summer research projects at the UT Research Day on November 18, 2005. Matthew Steffer, Ngoc (Nancy) Tran, and Alicia Tsai, all second year students, took home first, second and third place (respectively), along with cash prizes. Other students participating in the event include first year students Helen Martinez, Leslie Scruggs, and Michael Syamken and second year students Brett Chiquet, Shad Hanis, Huong (Kathy) Phan, Liza Shevchenko, and Justin Wright. All students participating are members of the Student Research Group (SRG) at the Dental Branch, a group that helps students find mentors to do summer projects with, as well as offer opportunities for students to present their data. In March, SRG members will travel to Orlando, Florida, and present their research at the American Association of Dental Research Meeting. Best of Luck students!


Faith and Science- A Marriage of Passions
By Shannan Kilpatrick

Picture of Dr. Henry StobelIs it possible as scientists, to keep our personal life separate from our work life? Some would say that becoming a scientist is a lifestyle more than simply a job. Others would argue the importance of keeping a balanced life and incorporate hobbies and passions that are separate from the lab. But what if we could unite the two worlds? Can there be a marriage of our personal lives and our lab life?

Henry Strobel is a full professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and has been at UTHSCH since 1972. During his professorship, he has graduated 27 students from his lab. “The Strobel lab is an excellent student environment, in part due to Henry's continual support of his students,” explains Dan Ryder, a first year student. “He always takes opportunities to teach, not only topics of science, but also historical and linguistical topics,” Ryder adds. In addition to mentoring graduate students and post doctoral fellows, Dr. Strobel serves as Associate Dean of Faculty Affairs and aids in the program development of the American Association of Medical Colleges. He also spends his time guiding medical students by way of the Student Affairs Office and accompanies medical students on a 4th year elective to China to serve at several hospitals in Beijing.

Dr. Strobel’s role as a scientist is obvious. What may not be as widely known is his role as an Episcopalian priest. The question then becomes, how does he find balance between his passion for the Faith and his passion for Science? He explained that Science is not unlike Faith in that it asks questions. Science asks the question “How”, while Faith asks the question, “Why.” He does not see the need to keep the two separate. Just as we organize the contents of our homes, we tend to compartmentalize the issues of life like a pair of socks and shoes. Life’s walls and compartments are a created entity and humans are the builders. We use this talent of compartmentalizing in order to maintain control in our lives and possibly the lives of others. Dr. Strobel’s view is that this creates barriers that prevent us from being a complete individual.
As a young man, Dr. Strobel wanted to “drink from the original well” and for three years, attended a Jewish synagogue. There he found that “participation was not only a gift, but thinking was permitted and required.” As he entered the synagogue, he was greeted by the inscription, “Know before Whom you stand”, a continuous reminder to ask questions to the point of understanding.

When his time at the synagogue had come to completion, Dr. Strobel was drawn to the Episcopalian faith because of its “beautiful liturgy, deep spirituality, demand for the care of humanity, and the welcoming of questions and challenges.” His fascination and curiosity ellicited a desire to join the Episcopalian Priesthood. At the beginning of his quest, he was discouraged by the council of others in the priesthood. However, he never abandoned the desire and continued on in his education, pursuing a Ph.D. in Biochemistry at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. While he was there, two first year medical students committed suicide. “I felt that something was grievously wrong,” remarked Dr. Strobel. It was this experience and others that strengthened his desire for the priesthood all the more.

During his post doctoral fellowship at Ann Arbor in Michigan, Dr. Strobel made a second attempt to pursue the priesthood and spoke with the bishop of the church he had been attending, St. Aidan’s. Assuming that Dr. Strobel was going to give up his life as a scientist to join the priesthood, the bishop discouraged him from entering. Dr. Strobel’s reply was simply, “I don’t want to stop being a biochemist to become a priest. I want to do both.” At the age of 26 and only at the beginning of his scientific career, he was accepted as a postulant to study for the priesthood. He went on to attend Seminary in Detroit and was a Deacon for 8 years before becoming ordained as a priest. Dr. Strobel currently serves at Palmer Memorial Church, near the Medical Center, and is also the chairman of the Diocesan Bioethics Commission.

As scientists, we are all aware that the pendulum swings to both extremes of an issue. Dr. Strobel eloquently states, “Both ends become absurd and we must rely on each other’s extreme opinion to bring us to the middle where wisdom lies,” Science is the pursuit of knowledge and wisdom. It is a balance. As scientists, we have the ability and responsibility to understand the world around us, to ask questions in pursuit of the answers, and to make this world a better place. Without other scientists, we could not do this. Dr. Strobel reminds us that “Wisdom isn’t mine or yours. It’s ours.”
When asked how his faith influences his life as a scientist, he simply answered, “It does not tell me what I can’t do research on. But it does tell me how I do research with other people and in the midst of what I do, it tells me how to behave.”